The People have spoken…

by admin on March 1, 2010

..what did they say? Well here in Taiwan with four seats up for grabs in the National Assembly the DPP got 3 while the ruling KMT only got 1. The DPP are claiming this as a mandate”

Su Chia-chuan, said the results were a demonstration of voters’ trust in the opposition party.

Well maybe or at least partly. I feel more strongly it is a trend which is due probably more to the immediacy of mass communications via the Internet than political strategy superiority of a given party or candidate. We live in the era of what I like to call “mayfly politics.” Where you win your election and need to hit the ground with your feet running as fast as a broadband connection. The stop watch starts ticking the moment you win and the people don’t have patience for anything anymore. So if you can’t maintain whatever spin, or momentum, or charm that got you elected you will be replaced by the other guys just like with the Democrats losing a seat that was fixed in granite it was so secure: Ted Kennedy’s to Scott Brown.

Who knows maybe what the people of  Taiwan will get is something better than what they were offered. Sadly, I feel what the Internet makes ever clearer everyone is playing the same old game and money is hard to beat anywhere.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Good points about immediacy of mass communications - unless a politician/party can show results straight away, they tend to quickly lose support. There are no honeymoon periods in politics anymore. The DPP appears to have the upper hand now, and Taiwan desperately needs a viable opposition (regardless of who's in power), but I don't think they can claim a mandate. In a lot of ways, it may have been a protest vote, especially as it essentially doesn't change anything on a national level. The December elections may give a clearer picture, and while the DPP currently have momentum, they may lose those gains if the economy continues to improve and grow.

    Taiwan politics is still so immature, that there's pretty much no difference between the two parties anyway.
  • michaelturton
    Yes, there's really no difference at all between the parties. For example, both killed five to ten million people in China and Taiwan, and the upper leadership of each consists of the people who benefited from those killings, and who spent their careers fighting democratization. Both had mass murderers in the presidency. Both argue that Taiwan should be part of China. Both have exactly the same take on economic relations with China. Both refused to cooperate with the other party when it was in power -- for example, the DPP never had a KMT premier or defense minister. Both are deeply integrated into the construction industrial state and the system of cross-strait organized crime/investment....

    I could go on. Of all the "insights" into Taiwan politics one hears, surely the equivalency claim is among the least supported by anything resembling reality.
  • bbluesman
    Michael I admit the DPP haven't killed millions yet, nor have they had the chance. All murders or casualties or collateral damage committed at that scale is political.
  • michaelturton
    It's entirely unsupportable to claim that both parties are the same, with the implication that selecting either one would produce the same consequences for the future of the island and its people. The DPP is a deeply flawed political party, but it is hardly a genuine evil like the KMT.
  • bbluesman
    I never claimed both parties are the same. You say tomato I say to-mah-to. I believe there are decent and evil people in both parties and hope you are right that DPP is less lousy :)
  • michaelturton
    Mark, I'm responding to Craig, not you.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: